November 24, 2002 7:01 AM

Election 2000: Proving Goebbel's "Big Lie" Theory

TOP 10 LIES OF ELECTION 2000

I know what the result of the 2000 Presidential election was. By now, anyone who reads this site with any regularity should be familiar with my position on it. Yes, I know Shrub "won" the election, and yes, I accept that he is now the sitting (if not legitimate) President. Frankly, I'm growing tired of those of you whose response to me is "Dude, get over it. Bush won." Y'all are going to have to present a more convincing argument than that tired mantra.

I'm sorry, y'all, but I was raised to believe that cheaters never prosper. Unless those of us who feel strongly keep shining a light on what we feel to be the truth- that Shrub stole the election- eventually Goebbels' "Big Lie" principle will kick in. Enough people will be saying that Shrub won that it will de facto become the truth. Well, I'm sorry, but from where I sit, it's NOT the truth, and I have no intention of letting time mask that reality. I'm not bitter, but I know what I believe.

With that in mind, I offer the Top 10 Lies of Election 2000 (from iknowwhatyoudidlastelection.com):


  1. The US Supreme Court manual recount ruling was a just decision by impartial judges. Is it justice to say, in essence, "you can recount if you change Florida law and complete the count in an hour and a half? Is it justice to cite “equal protection” as the basis for your ruling but disregard the fact that Florida would have already violated that law by, among other things, using balloting machines in some counties that produced a far greater error rate than in other counties? And what about states that violated the law by using different machines and methods than other states?

  2. The press conference conducted by Bush's Press Secretary and a GOP Governor detailing the conspiracy going on in the recount rooms. The shameless claims included Bush chads being scotch-taped to keep them attached to the ballot, and chads being eaten as a cover up. THE HORROR! In actuality, an absentee/overseas ballot or two was mailed in with tape on it and dislodged chads (on the floor or anywhere else) could only come from a chad that had already been penetrated which should count as a vote anyway.

  3. Al Gore tried to disenfranchise military voters (or as someone asserted, the votes of our men on the USS Cole!). Democratic lawyers did initially ask that overseas ballots adhere to law, but the Gore team later suggested that the ballots be re-evaluated and they never challenged any subsequent additions even though, at the request of Bush lawyers, selective counties recounted military ballots using different standards. Can you say, “Equal protection violation”?

  4. Counting indented chads is “mind reading” and “manufacturing” votes. The lawful term is “ascertaining the will of the voter”. The truth is, that if a chad has an indentation from a stylus (which can be easily discerned from a fingernail mark) it can only come from a person who intended to vote for a candidate or a person who was seriously inclined to vote for a candidate but was indecisive. Isn’t it better to ere on the side of counting intended votes rather than rejecting them all because a small percentage of them weren’t committed? You know, like being a “compassionate conservative” and showing leniency with the overseas ballots of military voters.

  5. Manual counts procedure is too flawed, especially in selected counties. What the Bush team was really saying amongst themselves was – WE DO NOT WANT ANY ADDITIONAL COUNTING TO BE DONE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES! Sure selective recounts under varying standards isn’t the best option, but it happens as part of law in elections all over the country and is a part of Florida law that Bush repeatedly waived access to for fear of a change in the results. It is worth noting that Florida’s certification does contain hundreds of votes for Bush acquired from manual counts in selective counties.

  6. Palm Beach’s “butterfly ballot” was legal. The truth is that the butterfly ballot did not follow legal guidelines but was deemed not illegal enough for a judge to have the courage to rightfully call for a Palm Beach revote. It is a shame when justice can’t be served because the remedy is just too damn much trouble!

  7. The tampering of Republican ballot applications in Seminol and Martin county was not illegal. The underhanded activities involved were not legal or moral, however, they were deemed not illegal enough for a judge to have the courage to rightfully subtract Republican votes.

  8. Bush called the winner on election night. This lie was initiated by George W’s cousin who worked at Fox and the rest of the networks jumped in. The exit polls called Florida right the first time -- for Gore, but that result was easier said then done because of the debacle of Florida’s voting execution and counting procedures.

  9. Calling Florida for Gore an hour before polls closed disenfranchised Bush voters. The truth is that both Gore voters and Bush voters would be equally discouraged from wasting their time after the election is called. Countless studies have shown that exit polling does not effect the outcome of an election.

  10. The media is predominantly liberal. Not anymore. Under the bright lights of the 36 day “in-decision 2000” the bushees could not help but out themselves. People like Chris Mathews of MSNBC helped us remember that the MS stands for Microsoft which stands for less regulation of big business.

No, I don't spend every day of my life bemoaning the travesty that took place two years ago. I understand that at some point, one must accept reality, however unpleasant and odious. I have done that. What I refuse to do is to buy into the "Shrub won the election" propaganda. That's a convenient mantra for Republicans, but it ignores the simple truth of November, 2000.

I know that I am a pronounced minority here. Telling me to "get over it" is not going to carry the debate, however. I will go to my grave believing that Shrub stole the election, though I know that NOTHING I believe will change the reality. I do find it sad, though, that after all those years of being taught by my parents that cheaters never prosper, I find out that they were wrong- dead wrong.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jack Cluth published on November 24, 2002 7:01 AM.

And at least as many types of whine? was the previous entry in this blog.

And the hits just keep on coming.... is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Contact Me

Powered by Movable Type 5.12