June 26, 2006 6:44 AM

It's a question that deserves to be asked...so why isn't it?

Is ‘Islamic’ the only adjective that modifies ‘terrorist’?

I found this post among the Daily Kos diaries, and it stuck with me because it’s asking a question that, while it deserves to be asked, never is. Indeed…why Is “Islamic” followed so closely by “terrorist” to the exclusion of all other flavors of terrorism, as if the radicalized Islamofascisti have a monopoly of sensless ideologically- and politically-fueled violence.

I don’t know that I’ve ever heard Eric Rudolph, Paul Hill, or Timothy McVeigh described as “Christian Terrorists”, and some so-called “Christians” would have us believe that there is no such thing as “Christian terrorism”. SInce peace and non-violence are at the core of Christian beliefs, Christians are somehow incapable of engaging in senseless thelological/ideological/political violence. Well, that’s easy to believe, and it may even theoretically be true, but so many Right-wing nutjobs have spread the banner of Christianity over themselves and their movements that violence has long been associated with intolerant Christian zealots. And it’s not as if there aren’t historical examples of Christians killing for their beliefs…do the Crusades ring a bell?

If you put your mind to it, it would be possible to quickly come up with an impressive collection of non-Islamic groups that could and should reasonably be tarred with the “terrorist” label. Of course, it IS easier, and it does fit the agenda of the Bush Administration to focus on Islamofascists. They’re swarthy, they’re nasty, they don’t think like us…and best of all, they’re phenomenally easy to demonize. Could the American government have asked for a better and easier to hate Bogeyman than swarthy men wearing beards, carrying Kalashnikovs, and spouting a religion and ideology so diametrically opposed to everything America stands for?

Until, and unless, we learn to address the threat of terrorism for what it truly is, we are only deluding ourselves. Terrorism- the use of senseless violence for political, theological, or ideological ends, is not the province of Islamofascists. Christians- or at least those who view themselves as representatives of The One True Faith- are every bit as capable of murder and mayhem in support of their agenda as radical Muslims. It’s easy to forget that peace and non-violence are also important parts of Islam. Christians need to remove their blinders and admit to themselves that there are terrorists right here in this country who claim the mantle of the teachings of Jesus Christ as their inspiration and justification.

Murder is murder, and until Americans lose their selectivity and denounce all flavors of it, we will never truly have any hope of being safe.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jack Cluth published on June 26, 2006 6:44 AM.

Another DUMB@$$ AWARD wiener was the previous entry in this blog.

Finally...the real threat exposed is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Contact Me

Powered by Movable Type 5.12