June 13, 2013 5:10 AM

Evidently, the 1st Amendment, unlike the 2nd, has limits and isn't sacrosanct

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told reporters on Tuesday that he approved of censoring snail mail if it was necessary to protect innocent lives.

“If I thought censoring the mail was necessary, I would suggest it, but I don’t think it is,” he said, according to Yahoo News.

The remarks came as Graham was answering questions about the National Security Agency’s surveillance program, which has indiscriminately amassed Americans’ phone records.

The Republican senator explained that censoring the mail had a precedent in American history. During World War II, letters sent to the U.S. from the battlefield were sometimes censored by military officials to prevent sensitive information from falling into the hands of our enemies Though the First Amendment was “sacrosanct,” it also “has limits,” Graham said.

“We don’t need to censor the mail, but we do need to find out what the enemy’s up to,” he concluded.

On Twitter, Graham objected to how his comments were being portrayed. He accused Yahoo News reporter Chris Moody of writing a “sensational headline.”

blog comments powered by Disqus

Technorati

Technorati search

» Blogs that link here

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jack Cluth published on June 13, 2013 5:10 AM.

IF you think Barack Obama is a Nazi, you might have Obama Derangement Syndrome was the previous entry in this blog.

No miracles, just the good fortune to have another day drawing breath is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Contact Me

Powered by Movable Type 5.2.6