September 14, 2007

There he goes again....

Poll: Most support tobacco tax

BALTIMORE - Two-thirds of Maryland voters favor doubling the $1-a-pack cigarette tax to expand health insurance coverage, according to a new state poll. The poll is part of a renewed push by a coalition of groups called the Maryland Citizens’ Health Initiative to raise tobacco taxes to both reduce smoking and cut the number of people without health insurance. The coalition, with AARP in the lead, is beginning a $100,000 statewide campaign of print and radio ads to drum up support for the plan. Maryland AARP Executive Director Joe DeMattos, said the increase in the cigarette tax represents “a health care policy trifecta”: It helps cure the general budget deficit and can be used to help the uninsured; it reduces the number of teens and children who might start smoking; and it stops several thousand smokers from smoking.

Yes, I’m going to begin this rant with the ritual disclaimer I employ whenever I wage into this issue:

THIS IS AN EMOTIONAL ARGUMENT FOR ME. WHILE IT MAY NOT MEET YOUR STANDARDS OF LOGIC AND REASON, I FRANKLY DON’T MUCH CARE. YOUR RIGHT TO SMOKE ENDS WHEN IT POLLUTES THE CLEAN AIR I MUST BREATHE IN ORDER TO CONTINUING LIVING. PERIOD. YOU DON’T HAVE TO LIKE MY ARGUMENT; YOU DON’T EVEN HAVE TO AGREE WITH IT. THAT’S NOT MY CONCERN. IN THE MEANTIME, MY WORK WILL ONLY BE COMPLETE WHEN SMOKERS ARE SO INCONVENIENCED AND DISINCENTIVIZED THAT SMOKING BECOMES TOO MUCH OF A HASSLE.

OK, now that I have that off my chest, I can get back to celebrating the continuing trend of marginalizing and disincentivizing smokers. NOT smokers, mind you…SMOKING. Having grown up with a father who smoked, and have lived and worked in parts of the former Yugoslavia, where smoking is the national sport, I have over the years become increasingly militantly anti-smoking. Yes, I realize that probably comes as a complete and utter shock to y’all, but if you light up around me, you will NOT like me. While I’m normally a fairly easy-going, laissez-faire personality, I turn into a mean-spirited and thoroughly unpleasant SOB when someone lights a cigarette up in my vicinity. It’s one thing if you choose to increase your risk of lung cancer, but I will not allow you to place my at the same risk simply because you feel the need to feed your addicition. This is why I am wholeheartedly supportive of anything that shows some promise of reducing the ranks of smokers.

A tax of $1.00 per pack may seem onerous to smokers, but there are many like me who believe that doubling or tripling the tax doesn’t begin to go far enough. The nature of tobacco addiction is such that some people will forego basic necessities in order to feed the monster. When I was living and working in Kosovo, I knew many people who couldn’t affored to feed their families…but somehow they always managed to have enough money for cigarettes. It shouldn’t take a Ph.D. to figure how wrong this is.

Will it take a $10 per carton tax? $15? $50? I don’t know the answer, but I do like the direction that this trend is heading. Speaking for myself, and I imagine for those militant anti-cigarette folks who think like me, I’m not going to be completely happy until tobacco is taxed to the point where it’s out of reach of virtually everyone. This may be a position seemingly at odds with my customary support of freedom of choice, but I don’t much care. My right to breathe clean air trumps your right to pollute said air. Period. End of story. Any questions??

11 Comments

Hear Hear!!!

I agree with you 100%....I say we tax that vile disgusting deadly habit right out of existence!

Tobacco manufacturers have been profiteering on the sale of product that is refined to be addictive.

To HELL with them!

TAX THEM TO DEATH!!!

R

I like Jack's periodic rants on this topic because he admits they are illogical.

Raising taxes on cigarettes beyond their already confiscatory levels just plain doesn't work!

Because the majority of smokers are in the lower economic quarters, it's actually a very regressive method of income redistribution. This effects not just low income smokers, but their children as well. Think of the kids, willya!

And of course, the black markets high taxes have created are wonderfully beneficial to all of society, right? In the months since Texas took that leap into totalitarianism known as the dollar per pack sin tax, a thriving industry of illegal importation has sprung up to meet free market demands. Don't want to pay the tax? Ten minutes on craigslist will find you a tax free fix for your nicotine addiction.

But if sin taxes are good for tobacco, they should work elsewhere too! For example:

  • Maybe a Big Mac Tax would encourage us to eat healthy
  • Since sedentary lifestyles are unhealthy, a dollar per hour TV-Tax would certainly go a long way towards discouraging couch potatoes
  • Mandatory annual weigh-ins could be used to levy a dollar-per-pound tax for everyone who exceeds their ideal body weight
  • Regular home inspections could be used to tax people whose pantries contain unhealthy levels of products high in cholesterol and saturated or trans-fats.

    Sin taxes are silly. But one thing's for sure, as long as people think they have the right to control others behaviors, they will try.

Uh...Bob? I've never admitted that my argument is illogical. What I HAVE said is that I realize it may not meet my reader's standards of logic and reason.

This is a public health issue. While we can choose whether or not we eat a Big Mac and fries, we generally cannot choose the air we breathe. If someone is polluting the air that I breathe in order to feed their addiction, you can bet that I'm going into full asshole mode immediatimente and unapologetically. Eating is a matter of choice; breathing generally isn't.

You're right Jack, I should have said admittedly flawed logic instead of simply illogical.

Before I go off on this rant, let me just state for the record (are you paying attention, Adam??) that I am fully aware of the holes in my argument. You know what, though? I don’t much care, because smoking is one of those issues that I feel very strongly about on a purely emotional level. So, there…deal with it.

aS USUSAL...MORE ABOUT ME,ME, ME....yOU PRON=BABLY DONT MIND A JUNKIE GETTING SOME CRACK BUT GOD FORBID SOMEBODY SMOKES AROUND YOU.JUST ANOTHER MICHEAL MOOR TYPE ARGUEMENT.

MORE MICHEAL MOOR TYPE LOGIC.YOU DONT MIND A CRACKHEAD BUT GOD FORBID SOMEBODY SMOKES AND INCONVIENCES YOU.JUST AMAZING THE SELF-ABSORBED WRITING HERE.

I think somebody needs a cigarette...

Thomas Blackmon
Please place the finger that cant stop hitting the post button back in your silly ass you mindless drone.

Better to be thought a fool than to be Thomas Blackmon and remove all doubt....

This is a reactionary response by the blogger to personal choice. There is nothing that will drive tens of millions of smokers like myself faster into the arms of the libertarians than anti-smoking fascists who won't be satisfied until everyone is exactly like them.

I don't have any problems with liberal concepts, just authoritarians masquerading as liberals.

Think you can stop tobacco smoking? Remember pot?

Hello All,

I was reading around some of the posts here and I found interesting things that you guys talk about, I just made a blog about quitting smoking resources and ideas that you might want to check out.
If someone is interested in this topic just go to; http://endthehabitnow.blogspot.com and let me know what you think.
Thanks in advance.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jack Cluth published on September 14, 2007 7:52 AM.

It's easier to tear someone down than to take their message to heart was the previous entry in this blog.

Ain't love grand?? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en